Frank Fahrenkopf, head of the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), recently discussed the organization's reduced role in the upcoming 2024 presidential debates on “The Daily Show,” humorously remarking, “WE AIN’T DEAD yet,” in response to questions about the CPD's future. This year, the CPD, which traditionally oversees presidential debates every four years, will not be involved. Instead, Joe Biden and Donald Trump have agreed to participate in two debates, organized and hosted by news networks. The first of these debates is scheduled for June 27th, a departure from the CPD's usual timing.

Since their revival in 1976, presidential debates in the United States have evolved significantly. Initially managed by the League of Women Voters, these debates faced challenges due to limited resources and the influence of presidential campaigns over moderator selections. In response, the Democratic and Republican parties established the CPD to centralize debate management. The CPD, funded through private sponsorships and host institution fees, such as those from universities, has maintained a stable budget and significant influence over debate logistics and format. Despite criticism and occasional candidate requests, like Al Gore's unique temperature request in 2000, the CPD has played a pivotal role in shaping modern presidential debates.

The shift to news networks hosting debates in 2024 marks a substantial departure from the CPD's established framework. This change raises questions about the future dynamics and accessibility of presidential debates. Will these alterations signify the beginning of a new era of more dynamic and accessible debate platforms, or could they potentially signal the end of the traditional CPD-managed debates? As the 2024 election cycle unfolds, the impact of these changes on public engagement and political discourse will undoubtedly shape the future landscape of presidential debates in the United States.