During the tenure of YS Jagan Mohan Reddy as Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh from 2019 to 2024, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh frequently intervened to overturn various policy decisions made by his government. The Court stepped in on multiple occasions to address issues ranging from the decentralization policy and English medium education decisions to reinstating officials and granting bail to key figures. The consistent judicial oversight was a result of the perceived haste and potential unsustainability of the government’s decisions.

In an unexpected turn of events, Jagan Mohan Reddy, who once vocally criticized the judiciary and accused it of bias—especially targeting then Chief Justice NV Ramana—has now shifted his stance significantly. Within just two months of the new government taking office, Jagan has filed petitions seeking judicial intervention on matters such as reinstating his security cover and obtaining the status of Leader of Opposition in the legislative assembly. His requests have sparked widespread criticism, given his previous stance and the current rules regarding opposition status and security.

This sudden change in Jagan Mohan Reddy's approach to the judiciary has raised eyebrows. While he was in power, he often expressed dissatisfaction with court rulings and alleged undue influence on the judiciary. Now, he is actively seeking the Court’s intervention, suggesting a significant shift in his perception of judicial impartiality. Regardless of the outcomes of his petitions, this development highlights a remarkable volte-face in Jagan’s approach to legal and political matters.